(Download) Anti-Oedipus (Bloomsbury Revelations) (EPUB) @ Amrit Ásta Ruslan

Anti-Oedipus (Bloomsbury Revelations)

Book by Gilles Deleuze

DETAILS

Publisher : Bloomsbury Academic; 1st edition (January 1, 2013) Language : English Paperback : 720 pages ISBN-10 : 1780936613 ISBN-13 : 978-1780936611 Item Weight : 1.28 pounds Dimensions : 5.47 x 1.18 x 8.5 inches Best Sellers Rank: #2,110,582 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #55,616 in Philosophy (Books) , THIS IS BRAND NEW BOOK.WE PROVIDE 100% CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. Read more

REVIEW

As far as the order, it came in a timely fashion - although their are some minor typos in the press. As far as the content of the book, I have mixed feelings - this book is a hot mess. The best thing anyone could say about it is what Foucault states in the preface, about the book being more a work of art than a great theoretical system (like Kant, or Hegel lets say). And I'll accept the book as that, just art. The book starts off very strong, but, once you realize the authors are basically saying the same thing ten different ways, it loses its magic. The read itself can be difficult at times, but, it is very well paced, so that once you trudge through enough technical philosophy, things open up quite brilliantly - like having gotten through the forest into the open field. That feeling in-itself, ends up being a highlight of the book in a sense. The philosophy itself is messy, lacks focus towards the end, is packed far too much with neologisms, and in many ways ends up seeming unoriginal. The concept of a "Body Without Organs" aside - Essentially you have a Spinozist materialism that integrates itself with Freud, Marx, Nietzsche, and a bunch of others far too obscure for most readers to have any reference to. This is also a weakness of the text, as it is not very accessible (even to philosophers) in terms knowing whether the authors' interpretations of these other writers are actually spot on, or not. This makes critical analysis a daunting task, coupled with the neologisms, and messy layout of ideas. Another critique is that (being someone who has worked extensively, and intimately with the mentally ill - most notably schizophrenics - for many years) I wonder about the depth of understanding of schizophrenia. Philosophy proper, yes - economics, sure - a properly thoughtful and empirical sense of schizophrenia? I am doubtful. Guattari, maybe - but I am very skeptical that Deleuze has any significant experience with schizophrenics, and in fact, in the text, most references to schizophrenia are from other peoples case notes/research - notably, the authors who themselves malign Freud. ... I also have a hard time getting past the vast amount of undue credit given to Oedipus as an institution, and deeply engrained unconscious pattern, social, and individual. Still, if one approaches the book as a work of art, its fantastic, entertaining, and at times hilarious. All criticism aside, the book has a compelling sense of mystery that it instills, a wonderful aesthetic. This alone can bring me back to this book, for likely, the rest of my life. There are grand moments of detailed, original, philosophy (the Body Without Organs being a shining display), they are just, well, mixed in with a whole lot of other stuff that maybe the book could have done without.

DOWNLOAD PAGE

Anti-Oedipus (Bloomsbury Revelations)